Shopping in Greater Philadelphia

Wanamakers Department Store interior showing historic organ located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Wanamaker’s department store was the first department store in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and one of the first department stores in the United States.

The closing of downtown Philadelphia’s last department store and the collapse of plans to locate the 76er’s arena on east Market Street have opened major questions, not just about the future of Market Street East but about the role of the city’s core more broadly.

Historically, department stores played a major role in anchoring the region. As population growth accelerated outside the city proper, rail transit connected burgeoning suburbs with the city core, where Philadelphia’s “Big Six” department stores offered not just a vast array of merchandise, but unparalleled opportunities to mix with fellow citizens, enjoy fine dining, and participate in civic rituals. Undoubtedly, Wanamaker’s epitomized the civic element of shopping with its grand court and massive organ offering hugely popular concerts. Appropriately, the 1911 store was designed by Daniel Burnam, whose 1909 Chicago plan epitomized what I have called “civitas by design”—using the built environment as a means of enhancing “the community of citizens.”

photograph of Ardmore Strawbridge & Clothier
The Strawbridge and Clothier in Ardmore opened to the public in 1930 and was one of the first department stores to open a branch in the suburbs of Philadelphia. (Special Collections Research Center, Temple University Libraries)

As decentralization accelerated in the twentieth century, especially under the influence of the automobile, downtown stores attempted to reach customers where they were by opening branch operations. Strawbridge & Clothier led the way, opening at Suburban Square in Ardmore in 1930 and just outside Jenkintown on Old York Road in 1931.  By mid-century, however, a whole different variation of the shopping experience emerged in the form of regional shopping centers. Taking advantage of an expanded highway network making shopping accessible to patrons from multiple jurisdictions, the new commercial structures offered a great deal of that civic sociability once associated with downtown department stores. As a pioneer in the genre and developer of the Cherry Hill Mall, opened in 1961 in Camden County, New Jersey, James Rouse liked to describe such centers as maintaining all the best features of the city core, without its attendant nuisances. Like downtown stores before them, these centers, which emerged throughout the region, offered a range of social opportunities, including fashion shows, a variety of dining options, and opportunities to celebrate national holidays and other civic rituals. In addition to affording social encounters with fellow citizens, such spaces became a preferred location for social gatherings. A number of former Camden residents who left the city after the upheaval of the early 1970s, for instance, met for years at the Cherry Hill Mall.

More recently, as the Internet has undermined bricks and mortar stores, the nature of shopping has changed. As individual consumers go online, they encounter neither the salespeople that once guided them to a purchase nor fellow shoppers, whether known or unknown to them. As habits shifted, shopping malls had to adapt in order to survive. While some followed their downtown predecessors by going out of business, others adjusted by incorporating new uses: medical or civic facilities, hotels, housing, and even sports facilities. Such adaptive uses have staved off the extinction of the building type but left the future of such facilities very much in question.

The same could be said for downtown shopping, as evidenced especially by the Gallery at Market Street East, as the development was marketed when it opened in 1977. Heralded for bringing the best of the suburbs (without its attendant nuisance) back to the city, the experiment never really took off. Plopping the 76ers arena down next to its latest iteration as the Fashion District looked a bit like suburban efforts to enliven shopping districts through the attraction of sports. But because professional games have only a limited schedule, the effect would have been limited. The right mix of intended uses could bring life back to the area, while at the same time helping stitch together nearby elements in ways that could help re-establish the area as a central heart to the region.

As Inquirer columnist Inga Saffron reports, the area already is following one lead from refurnished suburban shopping centers by attracting a mix of accessible recreational activities: paintball courses, Formula 1 simulators, arcade games, and indoor bounce houses for kids located into the spaces once occupied by clothing and furniture retailers. These complement other similar newcomers such as Puttshack, at the Shops at Liberty Place on Chestnut Street.

Such investments could help make downtown a desirable destination for more than just the casual visitor. To succeed, however, planners will need to envision a district that moves beyond novelty to enrichment, and here the area’s position between the soon-to-be-reopened Franklin Square SEPTA terminal and Chinatown to the north and the historic district to the south opens new opportunities for blending education and civic celebration with leisure activities. It’s a combination that makes it possible to imagine something so central to a wide range of area residents as well as tourists as to bring back memories of the importance of department stores like Wanamaker’s.

The contested path of the Sixers arena

Editor’s note: This is the first in a series of occasional blogs connecting contemporary issues with Greater Philadelphia’s storied history as documented in the Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia. Underlying these posts is the question whether we have learned sufficiently from the past to make the right decisions going forward.

Image depicts the original plan for the ’76ers stadium intended to be built in Market Street East. (Photo courtesy of phlsportsnation)

In the effort to identify regional connections between Philadelphia and the surrounding areas, Carolyn Adams and I found that nothing brought our area’s diverse people together across multiple counties in three states so much as professional sports. “The fact that thousands of avid sports fans from the suburbs poured into South Philadelphia for every home game fostered their identification with the rest of the region as perhaps no other activity could,” Adams concludes the overview chapter to our forthcoming book, The Greater Philadelphia Region. With the decision in the past few days to construct a new combined stadium for the ‘76ers and Flyers in the existing stadium district, that element of identity is only going to deepen. Whether one agrees with that decision or not, the winding and contested path to that decision raises serious questions both about the process and its ultimate resolution.

The Inquirer’s Helen Ubinas is not the only observer who thinks city interests proved secondary to profit-making throughout the two years of negotiations that took place.  From the start, the plan to make over part of Market Street East came not from planners or government officials, but from an aggressive real estate developer and part owner of the 76ers. As it had in the past—most notably in the failed effort to stop the Vine Street Expressway—the Chinatown community, with the most to lose, reacted vehemently against the proposal. Other nearby communities also opposed the move, which would have brought street traffic, congestion, and noise on game days and only questionable benefits on other days. Only belatedly, it became clear that peak attendance would overwhelm SEPTA without additional financial resources, which the team was unwilling to commit to in months of negotiations.

No doubt that part of downtown needed assistance. Hopes for the original Gallery Place at Market East project designed by the famed developer, James Rouse, never materialized, and its makeover as the “Fashion District” also faltered. There was a rationale for replacing part of that project with a stadium, but it was not one that followed from a planning process for the whole area. Ideally, city officials would have followed the approach it embraced for reconnecting the city to the waterfront, through a public planning process, greatly assisted by Penn Praxis’s executive director Harris Steinberg. Now the director of the Lindy Institute for Urban Innovation at Drexel, Steinberg weighed in on the 76s plan in a general sense by suggesting the location follow a less invasive course, citing a block across Market at Eleventh as a model. Other downtown locations were suggested but never seriously entertained during the course of debate.

One could well argue that an alternative downtown location could have helped the city, without destroying a vulnerable neighborhood nearby as the Capital Arena in Washington did in totally overwhelming its adjacent Chinatown. One might look to Detroit, for example. Instead, the 76ers, in partnership with Comcast, will now build a new arena in South Philadelphia as part of a much larger makeover of the sports complex, bringing new housing and retail to an area currently devoid of character and animation outside of the stadiums, with the single exception of the nearby casino. What these billionaire partners have in mind is something like the entertainment and sports complex Battery Atlanta.

Revitalizing the existing sports complex will undoubtedly boost city taxes over time, while removing the political costs of potentially destroying a valued neighborhood. But there are downsides as well. The South Philadelphia location remains remote from the city core, forcing primary reliance on auto traffic, without the compensating effect of spillover business from sports events for a struggling downtown.  With the simultaneous loss of the downtown’s last major department store, Market Street has been further damaged. While city officials speak optimistically about refiguring the historic Wanamaker building in the wake of Macy’s closure as part of an alternate plan for Market Street East, those ideas remain vague so far. One can only hope that the next steps incorporate a participatory and professional planning process that will enhance, rather than continue to weaken the core at the heart of the region.

Howard Gillette
Contributing Editor

 

Connecting the Past with the Present, Building Community, Creating a Legacy